NOT HALĀLI‘I

Main Image

Main Image

'NOT HALĀLI‘I'

Status: Held in Collections

Background Information: There is virtually nothing known about this sugarcane. The general characteristics of the cane are consistent with Hawaiian varieties. Recent genetic analysis also supports this concept. Accession notes associated with this cane include “not quite ‘Ie‘ie,” “definitely Hawaiian,” and “close to Halāli‘i.” This cane appears to have entered the collections through Waimea Arboretum from a private donation and spread to other germplasms from there.

Identifying Characteristics: Stalks are typically dark purple. Internodes can be extremely bobbin shaped, being much fatter at the bottom than the top. This cultivar may be confused for other dark canes

Stalk Color

Stalk Color

muddy red to purple; wax bloom very sparse to light

Internode

Internode

strongly bobbin or conical shaped, notable leaf scar with thick lip; bud furrow deep or shallow, extends the length of the internode; wax band medium broad, prominent; growth ring darker than stalk, tumescent; root band same as stalk or slightly darker, 3–4 rows of eyes

Bud

Bud

purple, ovate, sparsely pubescent; bud wings purple, inserted at or above the center of the bud

Leaf

Leaf

erect, average size; sheath green, occasionally flushing with purple, moderately to heavily waxy, sparsely to moderately pubescent; dewlap yellow-green or green, ascending squarish deltoid or ascending double crescent; sheath green, moderately pubescent down center only; dewlap narrow and ascending; greater auricle is a small nub occurring well below the dewlap with a large tuft of short to medium-length hairs; lesser auricle is transitional with large tuft of short to medium-length hairs

Flesh

Flesh

white or very light brown

Tassel

Tassel

not observed

Growth

Growth

erect to semi-erect, moderate width and height

  • Information

Status: No Known Specimens

Background Information: ‘Ainakea literally means “white (kea) pith/bagasse (‘aina)” or “white land (‘?ina).” According to Fornander this name refers to a particular episode in Hawaiian mythology: K?‘ula and K?ne, two powerful akua, practiced their sorcery on the people of Honua‘ula, Maui, and left the bodies of the dead strewn about and exposed. The duo added further insult by snacking on sugarcane grown by the victims to quench their thirst; since this time the cane has been called ‘Ainakea in reference to the white bones left bleaching in the sun. However, many l?‘au lapa‘au sources indicate that the name refers to the flesh of the cane, which is said to be the whitest of all Hawaiian canes – a particularly rare trait for a dark-skinned variety. An alternative name, Laenihi, refers generally to high-headed labroid fish of the genera Hemipteronotus and Iniistius. Another name, P?kea, is a quantifying term applied to Laenihi that refers to a whitish coloration and was used to denote a specific species of fish. ‘Ainakea was one of the few canes used in medicinal concoctions by the kahuna h?h?, and was important in the treatments for p?‘ao‘ao, ‘ea, hilo, and waiki.

Historical Description: ‘Ainakea is said to be [DE1] one of the prettiest Hawaiian canes, similar in appearance to ‘?hi‘a when it is young but lightening in color as it grows. It was often said to be one of the best-producing native cane varieties and was popular cane home gardens, particularly in dry and lowland areas.

Stalk Color

 

The stalks are described by Moir as “maroon-red and striped with apple-green when young, and changing to purplish-red and yellow when mature”; by Fornander as “red with long white stripes”; and by Spencer as “a ribbon cane, green and purple.” Alternatively, Ka‘aiakamanu compares it to Manulele (a striped cane), and states that the stalks were “dark reddish as the p?polo liquid.”

 

Authored by: Noa Kekuewa Lincoln.  
Please properly cite any use of information or graphics from this page. 

Lincoln, N. (2017) Kō: An Ethnobotanical Guide to Hawaiian Sugarcane Varieties. 
Retrieved from: http://cms.ctahr.hawaii.edu/cane/Home.aspx